<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{configuration}}?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{orientation}}?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{multipole}}?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{}}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AP</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ASTRA Proceedings</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AP</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">ASTRA Proc.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2199-3963</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/ap-2-45-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>The power spectrum of cosmic ray arrival directions</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The power spectrum of CR arrival directions}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Ahlers}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ahlers</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          <email>mahlers@icecube.wisc.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>WIPAC &amp; Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. Ahlers (mahlers@icecube.wisc.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>2</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>45</fpage><lpage>49</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ap.copernicus.org/articles/2/45/2015/ap-2-45-2015.html">This article is available from https://ap.copernicus.org/articles/2/45/2015/ap-2-45-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://ap.copernicus.org/articles/2/45/2015/ap-2-45-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://ap.copernicus.org/articles/2/45/2015/ap-2-45-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Various experiments show that the arrival directions of multi-TeV cosmic rays
show significant anisotropies at small angular scales. It was recently argued
that this small scale structure may arise naturally by cosmic ray diffusion
in a large-scale cosmic ray gradient in combination with deflections in local
turbulent magnetic fields. We show via analytical and numerical methods that
the non-trivial power spectrum in this setup is a direct consequence of
Liouville's theorem and can be related to properties of relative diffusion.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Various CR observatories have revealed anisotropies in the
arrival directions of TeV-PeV Galactic CRs on large and small angular scales
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.1"/>.
The explanation of the strength and phase of the observed dipole anisotropy
is challenging, but is qualitatively consistent with the diffusive prediction
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.2"/>. Medium and small scale anisotropies
could be a combined effect of nearby CR sources
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.3"/> and the local interstellar magnetic
field structure introducing an energy-dependent magnetic mirror leakage
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.4"/>, preferred CR transport directions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.5"/>
or magnetic lenses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx13" id="altparen.6"/>). The possible
influence of the heliosphere via magnetic reconnection in the heliotail
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.7"/>, non-isotropic particle transport in the heliosheath
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.8"/> or the heliospheric electric field structure
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.9"/> have also been considered. More exotic models invoke
strangelet production in molecular clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.10"/> or in
neutron stars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p>We will focus in this paper on the power spectrum of small-scale anisotropies
in the arrival directions of CRs. This has been studied by IceCube
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.12"/> with about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collected CR events at
median energy of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and more recently with HAWC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.13"/> including <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> events at a median
energy of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are usually expressed in terms of the
relative intensity map <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> defined by the local phase space
distribution (PSD) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
angular averaged CR density. The data points shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>
correspond to the multipole power spectra defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        An average, both power spectra show a strong contribution of low-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
multipoles and a subsequent fall-off of high-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> multipole power. Note
that the analysis of the power spectra in both experiments are affected by
the limited field of view (FoV) and the finite size of the event samples. The
limited FoV introduces cross-talk between the power of neighboring multipoles
and introduces large uncertainties in the reconstruction of the low-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
multipole moments. On the other hand, the finite size of the event sample
introduces noise at the level of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sky</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CR</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sky</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective fraction
of the sky that contains <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CR</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collected events. For IceCube we can
estimate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sky</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and for HAWC with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sky</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we have
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HAWC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These different noise
levels are indicated as horizontal dotted lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Observed power spectra from IceCube <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.14"/> and HAWC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.15"/> (from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.16"/>). The horizontal
dotted lines indicate the experimental resolution (shot noise). The dashed
line indicates the asymptotic solution discussed in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.17"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ap.copernicus.org/articles/2/45/2015/ap-2-45-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>It has been argued by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.18"/> that the appearance of
small-scale anisotropies is a natural consequence of CR propagation in the
local turbulent magnetic field with a global dipole anisotropy set by
diffusion. It was subsequently shown that the behavior of the power spectra
inferred from experimental data can be explained by a hierarchical transition
between multipole moments in local turbulence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.19"/>. The
result of this analytical model is also shown as a dashed line in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. In this paper we will summarize the results of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.20"/> and the recent update of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.21"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Gedankenexperiment</title>
      <p>We first consider a case of a idealized situation where the initial PSD
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is homogeneous but non-isotropic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.22"/>. Using
Liouville's theorem, we can simply relate the PSD at a later time to the
initial homogenous configuration as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Numerically, this
corresponds to the backtracking of CRs with arrival orientation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
along their trajectory to the initial homogeneous configuration at time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The multipole spectrum of the PSD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can then be simply related to the
initial configuration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> via the identity

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        This expression is for a particular magnetic field ensemble. However, for the
ensemble-average we can make use of the fact that the combination of a
regular and average random rotation of an isotropic distribution is
eventually isotropic. More precisely, in the case of pure turbulence the
average distribution is isotropic at all times, whereas for the combination
of turbulent and regular magnetic fields the average distribution at
intermediate times can in principle be non-isotropic but is expected to reach
an isotropic state eventually. Therefore, we can relate the power spectra at
different times as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="〈" close="〉"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Some additional assumptions have to be made to infer the power of individual
multipoles. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.23"/> argued that individual multipole powers
decay with a rate proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, from the
expression (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) we know that this process also redistributes
power between multipole moments. If one makes the assumption that the
transition between powers is <italic>hierarchical</italic> and the decay of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generates only power in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> one can derive an asymptotic
form of the relative power given by the simple expression

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The same relative power spectrum should also be followed by the relative
intensity map <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We show the ratio (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) in
Fig. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) in comparison with the power spectrum observed with IceCube
and HAWC. The scaling of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> multipoles is well described by the
asymptotic form (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>).</p>
      <p>Note, however, that the individual ensemble-averaged contributions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.24"/> all decay exponentially
in time. For the discussion of the expected small-scale anisotropies of a
quasi-stationary diffusion state it is necessary to introduce an effective
source term in form of the large-scale CR gradient. This was recently
discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.25"/> and we summarize this approach in the
next sections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Relative diffusion</title>
      <p>The previous thought experiment was designed to extract the influence of the
local turbulence on the redistribution of multipole power. In order to apply
these results to the realistic case of cosmic ray diffusion we have to
account for source terms of the initial dipole anisotropy in the form of a
cosmic ray gradient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Instead of a homogeneous initial condition
we can approximate this situation by assuming a quasi-stationary solution as
a result of Fick's law <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.26"/>,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffusion tensor and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the local (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) CR
density. The standard dipole prediction of the relative intensity is in this
case

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        We can now use again Liouville's theorem to evaluate the sum over multipoles.
For large look-back times <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the spatial term in the ansatz (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>)
dominates over the anisotropy induced by Fick's law. The ensemble-averaged
power spectrum of the relative intensity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can then be evaluated as

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The sum over dipoles as in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is not constant in this
case, but increases linearly for large backtracking times <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. More
precisely, the sum over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> multipoles approaches
asymptotically<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p>We use the identity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></fn>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where the symmetric part of the <italic>relative</italic> diffusion tensor is defined
as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.2}{9.2}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mo>lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">〉</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This shows that the effect
of the generation of small-scale anisotropies from local turbulence is
connected to relative diffusion. Note that the multipoles in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) are expected to be finite in the limit of large
backtracking times since particle trajectories with arbitrarily small opening
angles will eventually become uncorrelated, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the next section we will describe
simulations of this process that show this asymptotic behavior of the power
spectrum numerically.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Simulation</title>
      <p>We follow the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="normal.27"/> and define a turbulent magnetic field as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9}{9}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wave vectors <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have random orientations in three dimensions
and fixed amplitudes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. equal logarithmic spacing. The
parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are random phases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
vectors <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">b</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined as unit vectors in the
direction <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">e</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. In this way the field obeys <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
amplitudes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        We assume that for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the turbulence follows a
Kolmogorov-type turbulence with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The scaling factor
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is normalized such that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a wave vector corresponding to the coherence scale of
the turbulent magnetic field.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>The evolution of the ensemble-averaged power spectrum
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) in units of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a CR gradient
parallel (solid lines) and perpendicular (dotted lines) to the regular
magnetic field and the 3-D turbulence model discussed in the main text (see
also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.28"/>). We show results in terms of the dipole
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black), monopole <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and
medium-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> multipoles (green). We also show the asymptotic noise level
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>) (red) and the dipole prediction
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) of standard diffusion (magenta) evaluated by the
replacement <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ap.copernicus.org/articles/2/45/2015/ap-2-45-2015-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In our simulation we assume <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and choose <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We fix the rigidity of the CRs to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We sample over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> different turbulent magnetic
field configurations. For each field configuration we uniformly sample
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pix</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 288 CR orientation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> following the
<italic>HEALPix</italic> parametrization (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>side</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.29"/>,
that we track back through the static magnetic field <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">e</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to find the initial
orientation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and position <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the power spectrum at different times determined via
a multipole expansion of the maps using the <italic>HEALPix</italic> utilities.</p>
      <p>At large times the high-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components in the multipole expansion are
dominated by shot noise, due to the finite sample size and the uncorrelated
random walk at large back-tracking times. This noise level can be estimated
as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Therefore, for large backtracking times <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the map is eventually dominated
by noise. However, for sufficiently low multipole moments and large sample
size <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the stable asymptotic behavior of low-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> multipoles
can be recovered.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We have discussed in this paper the generation of small-scale
anisotropy from CR propagation in local magnetic turbulence. We have shown
that with minimal assumptions about the decay of and transition between
multipole powers one can derive an asymptotic solution that is consistent
with observations of IceCube and HAWC. We have discussed our recent approach
to bring these results into a more realistic setup of CR diffusion with a
large-scale CR gradient. One can show analytically that the generation of
multipole power is related to properties of relative CR diffusion. This was
supported by numerical simulations.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank Philipp Mertsch for collaboration and the
organizers of <italic>Cosmic Ray Anisotropies</italic> 2015 for a very pleasant
conference. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under
grants OPP-0236449 and PHY-0236449. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: P. Desiati <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aartsen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Aartsen, M. G., Abbasi, R., Abdou, Y., et al. (IceCube Collaboration): The
IceCube Neutrino Observatory Part III: Cosmic Rays, arXiv:1309.7006, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Abbasi et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Abbasi, R., Abdou, Y., Abu-Zayyad, T., et al. (IceCube Collaboration):
Observation of Anisotropy in the Arrival Directions of Galactic Cosmic Rays
at Multiple Angular Scales with IceCube, Astrophys. J., 740, 16,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/16</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Abdo et al.(2008)Abdo, Allen, Aune, Berley, Blaufuss
et al.</label><mixed-citation>Abdo, A. A., Allen, B., Aune, T., et al.: Discovery of Localized Regions of
Excess 10-TeV Cosmic Rays, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 221101,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.221101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.221101</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Abdo et al.(2009)Abdo, Allen, Aune, Berley, Casanova
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Abdo, A. A., Allen, B., Aune, T., et al.: The Large Scale Cosmic-Ray
Anisotropy as Observed with Milagro, Astrophys. J., 698, 2121–2130, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Abeysekara et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Abeysekara, A., Alfaro, R., Alvarez, C., et al. (The HAWC Collaboration):
Observation of Small-scale Anisotropy in the Arrival Direction Distribution
of TeV Cosmic Rays with HAWC, 796, 108, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/108</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Aglietta et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Aglietta, M., Alekseenko, V. V., Alessandro, B., Antonioli, P., Arneodo, F.,
Bergamasco, L., Bertaina, M., Bonino, R., Castellina, A., and Chiavassa, A.:
Evolution of the cosmic ray anisotropy above <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> eV, Astrophys. J.,
692, L130–L133, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Ahlers(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Ahlers, M.: Anomalous Anisotropies of Cosmic Rays from Turbulent Magnetic
Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 021101, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.021101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.021101</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Ahlers and Mertsch(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Ahlers, M. and Mertsch, P.: Small-Scale Anisotropies of Cosmic Rays from
Relative Diffusion, arXiv:1506.05488, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Amenomori(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Amenomori, M.: Anisotropy and Corotation of Galactic Cosmic Rays, Science,
314, 439–443, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Amenomori et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Amenomori, M., Ayabe, S., Cui, S. W., et al. (The Tibet AS? Collaboration):
Large-scale sidereal anisotropy of Galactic cosmic-ray intensity observed by
the Tibet air shower array, Astrophys. J., 626, L29–L32,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/431582</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Bartoli et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bartoli, B., Bernardini, P., Bi, X. J., et al. (ARGO-YBJ Collaboration):
Medium scale anisotropy in the TeV cosmic ray flux observed by ARGO-YBJ,
Phys. Rev. D, 88, 082001, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.082001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevD.88.082001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Battaner et al.(2011)Battaner, Castellano, and
Masip</label><mixed-citation>Battaner, E., Castellano, J., and Masip, M.: Cosmic magnetic lenses, Astron.
Astrophys., 527, A79, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361/201015663</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Battaner et al.(2015)Battaner, Castellano, and
Masip</label><mixed-citation>Battaner, E., Castellano, J., and Masip, M.: Magnetic fields and cosmic ray
anisotropies at TeV energies, Astrophys. J., 799, 157,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/157</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Biermann et al.(2013)Biermann, Becker, Seo, and
Mandelartz</label><mixed-citation>Biermann, P. L., Becker, J., Seo, E.-S., and Mandelartz, M.: Cosmic ray
transport and anisotropies, Astrophys.J., 768, 124,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/124</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Blasi and Amato(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Blasi, P. and Amato, E.: Diffusive propagation of cosmic rays from supernova
remnants in the Galaxy. II: anisotropy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. P., 1201, 011,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/01/011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1475-7516/2012/01/011</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Desiati and Lazarian(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Desiati, P. and Lazarian, A.: Anisotropy of TeV Cosmic Rays and the Outer
Heliospheric Boundaries, Astrophys. J., 762, 44,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/44" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/44</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Drury(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Drury, L. O'C.: The problem of small angular scale structure in the cosmic
ray anisotropy data, 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2013),
2–9 July 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Drury and Aharonian(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Drury, L. O'C. and Aharonian, F.: The puzzling MILAGRO hot spots, Astropart.
Phys., 29, 420–423, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Giacalone and Jokipii(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Giacalone, J. and Jokipii, J.: The Transport of Cosmic Rays across a
Turbulent Magnetic Field, Astrophys. J., 520, 204–214, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Giacinti and Sigl(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Giacinti, G. and Sigl, G.: Local Magnetic Turbulence and TeV–PeV Cosmic Ray
Anisotropies, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 071101,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.071101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.071101</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Gorski et al.(2005)Gorski, Hivon, Banday, Wandelt, Hansen
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Gorski, K., Hivon, E., Banday, A., Wandelt, B., Hansen, F., Reinecke, M., and
Bartelmann, M.: HEALPix – A Framework for high resolution discretization,
and fast analysis of data distributed on the sphere, Astrophys. J., 622,
759–771, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Guillian et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Guillian, G., Hosaka, J., Ishihara, K., et al. (Super-Kamiokande
Collaboration): Observation of the anisotropy of 10-TeV primary cosmic ray
nuclei flux with the super-kamiokande-I detector, Phys. Rev. D, 75, 062003,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.062003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevD.75.062003</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Jones(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, F. C.: The generalized diffusion-convection equation, Astrophys. J.,
361, 162–172, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Kotera et al.(2013)Kotera, Perez-Garcia, and Silk</label><mixed-citation>
Kotera, K., Perez-Garcia, M. A., and Silk, J.: Strangelets and the TeV–PeV
cosmic-ray anisotropies, Phys. Lett. B, 725, 196–199, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Lazarian and Desiati(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lazarian, A. and Desiati, P.: Magnetic reconnection as the cause of cosmic
ray excess from the heliospheric tail, Astrophys. J., 722, 188–196, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Malkov et al.(2010)Malkov, Diamond, Drury, and
Sagdeev</label><mixed-citation>
Malkov, M., Diamond, P., Drury, L., and Sagdeev, R.: Probing Nearby CR
Accelerators and ISM Turbulence with Milagro Hot Spots, Astrophys. J., 721,
750–761, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Mertsch and Funk(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Mertsch, P. and Funk, S.: Solution to the cosmic ray anisotropy problem,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 021101, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.211102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.211102</ext-link>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Perez-Garcia et al.(2014)Perez-Garcia, Kotera, and
Silk</label><mixed-citation>
Perez-Garcia, M. A., Kotera, K., and Silk, J.: Anisotropy in Cosmic rays from
internal transitions in neutron stars, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 742,
237–240, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Salvati and Sacco(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Salvati, M. and Sacco, B.: The Milagro anti-Center hot spots: cosmic rays
from the Geminga Supernova?, Astron. Astrophys., 485, 527–529, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
